Joel Purra

@nicowilliams: regarding comment in https://github.com/joelpurra/jq/commit/784fbc37ba6c42a28f2ac358ceeba08b08a3b5db for "Use P/jq/main.jq if no -f and no direct filter"; this is the old packages/projects difference confusion. Packages (only functions, only imported as modules) and...

@nicowilliams: doesn't mean just about every other interpreter is right. I'll drop the commit though. It was meant to come later anyways, but it was easier to implement than reading...

@nicowilliams: checking the length is much smarter than my solution, thanks! All that should be merged (already).

@nicowilliams: the tests in jqnpm are more evolved (emulating remote git server and the local cache, etcetera), so please check them out. I'll keep the `-f` emulation in `jqnpm execute`...

@dtolnay: haven't rebased my jq fork since May, so it looks like this pull-request is a bit outdated. The last thing I did was incorporate @nicowilliams' suggested changes (https://github.com/stedolan/jq/pull/673#issuecomment-105561222). Feature-wise...

@nicowilliams, @dtolnay: rebased and pushed. Please test, lint etcetera to make sure the C code is alright. @pkoppstein, @slapresta, @wtlangford, @agordon, others interested: please test this pull request against [joelpurra/jqnpm@jq-package-root](https://github.com/joelpurra/jqnpm/tree/jq-package-root)....

Any news on this?

Haven't updated my forked `jq` branch [`joelpurra:package-root`](https://github.com/joelpurra/jq/tree/package-root) since July 2015, so it's 100+ commits behind `jq`'s `HEAD` (and I have not been tracking relevant/related changes). Either way, made it easier...