Joel Ostblom

Thanks for your comments @kanitw ! > That said, taking a step back, I think if we support inline calculate instead of field, then we can support both jitter and...

Thanks for exploring this @ChiaLingWeng ! If I understand correctly it seems like your first working spec is similar to this [example from the Altair gallery](https://altair-viz.github.io/gallery/us_incomebrackets_by_state_facet.html). The key in these...

@ChiaLingWeng Ah I see, thanks for elaborating. I think what you are suggesting makes sense and it's exciting to see a potential solution that would bring faceted maps to VL!...

Thanks for taking the time to look into this further @ChiaLingWeng. I was trying to understand it better myself by using a simpler example that does not involve a transform...

Thanks for the ping @krassowski . Unfortunately, I'm currently have too many things on my plate and since it was a while ago I worked on this PR last I...

Would it make sense if the default was `"frame": "group"` for all values of `anchor` instead of that it changes depending on if `anchor` is "middle" or "left"?

I came across another example where it would be useful to differentiate between major and minor axis ticks. This chart with log axes looks rather visually noisy with the default...

Personally, I too have a (weak) preference for keeping separate nomenclature for methods that write to files vs those that return an object. So my vote here would be to...

Just a note about re-opening. This is not closed by #3218 and should remain open until we know if https://github.com/vega/vega/issues/1681 will be implemented in Vega or if should create a...

Thanks for the report; I think you are correct that it is related to the parameters being lifted to top level. You can run the following to see which spec...