Jonathan Lebon

> See this story https://blogs.gnome.org/mclasen/2018/03/22/fedora-atomic-workstation-almost-fool-proof/ for some of the unintended consequences that can occur with the combination of package layering and a fixed number of deployments FWIW, https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/1960 will fix...

> I hate to be that guy, but what is status of this issue? It's not being actively worked on AFAIK. Note that nowadays, there's `ostree admin pin` to prevent...

> It's actually not that much new code. It's more a lot of reshuffling code we already have. On that topic, although there isn't any C code being converted to...

> One problem here is that I'd like to make increasing use of systemd in the daemon. We already added `isolation.rs` which goes in that direction, and if we go...

So how do we feel about this approach? Worth cleaning up and pursuing? We'll incur some churn in splitting out the `callimpl` functions, but it's mostly a mechanical thing and...

> What if we reworked things such that the single DBus invocation was `UpdateDeployment`? Then we'd have a single mux call. Hmm, so you mean e.g. fold `InitramfsEtc` into `UpdateDeployment`?...

Related: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1657367

Hey @Razaloc, check out https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/3125, which is a recent PR that plumbs through a new switch for an idea of how everything fits together. In the case of repo overrides,...

Short-term, it may be easier to leave it on during the compose but configure the OS to permissive mode.

I think this would be cool, though ideally rpm-ostree isn't the primary UX for managing FSB but rather GNOME Software, which is already localized. Obviously, there's still a lot of...