EfficientUNetPlusPlus icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
EfficientUNetPlusPlus copied to clipboard
verified publisher icon jlcsilva

Drive evaluation result

Open loopdigga96 opened this issue 4 years ago • 2 comments

Hi @jlcsilva thanks for your repository and paper. It was really interesting to read it but I cannot find any evaluation of your approach on public datasets. You mentioned DRIVE in repository but what is actual performance on this dataset?

loopdigga96 avatar Jul 01 '21 12:07 loopdigga96

Hey @loopdigga96, you're welcome! Unfortunately, I still haven't obtained approval for sharing the coronary artery dataset. Regarding DRIVE, I still haven't had time to adjust parameters and train it. Due to the lower amount of data (~20 images vs ~200 images), the augmentation policy and loss function hyperparameters will probably need to be fine-tuned for optimal performance. I'm currently finishing a some other work, but I hope to be able to train it soon. I will get back to you with results when I do!

However, taking into account the 0.8149 F1-score of the ResUNet, which the EfficientUNet++ significantly outperforms in the coronary artery segmentation task, I would expect the EfficientUNet++ to perform better or at least as well as the ResUNet (while being more computationally efficient!)

jlcsilva avatar Jul 01 '21 17:07 jlcsilva

Thanks for you response @jlcsilva! It would be great to hear the results from you.

loopdigga96 avatar Jul 02 '21 12:07 loopdigga96