Jim Idle

I would need to see your grammar. There are a couple of small performance improvement patches that I intend to release very shortly. But I had debated just not allowing...

Please note new release: https://github.com/antlr4-go/antlr/releases/tag/v4.13.1 This allows you to turn off mutexes with the build tag `-tags antlr.nomutex` I will check your grammar and listener in a few days. But...

I took a Quick Look at the grammar that’s your issue. It is very ambiguous and days not use left revision well for precedence. Binary ops are usually higher precedence...

> Sorry for the late reply, I'm not feeling well these days and had some rest. Thanks for your suggestions about how we avoid the mutex, and I'll benchmark the...

@parrt This can be closed. The grammar was the problem, not ANTLR or the Go runtime.

I am happy to look at this guys, however it might take me a day or so to get some time on it. As I have never come across this...

OK, so the problem isn't that `start` is a keyword in `Go`, but that using `start` as a label, causes the generation of a method for the rule that is...

It does not implement this at the moment. I will take a look at it, but this strategy relies on Exceptions and came from Java. Painc might in fact be...

@parrt this can be closed as won't fix.

This grammar is unfortunately garbage. I am an advocate of removing it as it comes up often. After spending sometime with the Go runtime to allow such poor grammars to...