Jérôme Laban

@Daoting Please see https://github.com/unoplatform/uno/blob/release/stable/4.5/doc/articles/get-started-wizard.md/#dont-know-how-to-marshal-a-return-value-of-type-systemintptr GitHubuno/get-started-wizard.md at release/stable/4.5 · unoplatform/unoBuild Mobile, Desktop and WebAssembly apps with C# and XAML. Today. Open source and professionally supported. - uno/get-started-wizard.md at release/stable/4.5 · unoplatform/uno

@ebariche was this fixed by https://github.com/unoplatform/uno/pull/9226 ?

Thanks for the feedback. This specific block is done based on the feedback from the WinUI team directly, but it would make sense to change for the newer property, indeed....

It looks like there are some small conflicts based on related changes.

Looks like there's still a missing ap.manifest file :) ``` C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual Studio\2022\Enterprise\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v17.0\VSSDK\Microsoft.VsSDK.targets(1447,5): Error VSSDK1016: Failed to create the zipfile "obj\Release\CSharp\Uno Platform\1033\UnoApp.zip". Could not find file 'C:\a\1\s\src\SolutionTemplate\UnoSolutionTemplate\Skia.Gtk\app.manifest'. ```

Looks like we're still using the manifest in the GTK app: `CSC : error CS1926: Error opening Win32 manifest file D:\a\1\s\src\SamplesApp\SamplesApp.Skia.Gtk\app.manifest -- Could not find file 'D:\a\1\s\src\SamplesApp\SamplesApp.Skia.Gtk\app.manifest'`

This may be a similar issue to https://github.com/unoplatform/uno/issues/9038, though because it's wasm, it's likely because `` does not take new lines into account by default.

@Arlodotexe indeed. VS does not virtualize that list, but still, we have in the plans to unlist intermediate versions of packages to make this part easier :)

This change seems odd: https://dev.azure.com/uno-platform/Uno%20Platform/_build/results?buildId=51976&view=ms.vss-test-web.build-test-results-tab&runId=1910422&resultId=100409&paneView=debug Looks like it's adding one line at the bottom. Is it expected?

Thanks for the report. Could you provide a complete repro sample to make sure we're validating against the same issue?