Juliusz Chroboczek

I'll be glad to consider a patch. Note that you'd need to deal with the case where both the bucket and the adjacent buckets are empty.

I agree, it would be nice. For now, please use a Unix system ;-)

That's clearly wrong. Please find where `F_OK` is defined, and include the right file in `polipo.h`.

Which RFC is this described in?

Shouldn't we be sending the user info to the server somewhere?

I'm still waiting for an explanation why this is useful, and why it is the business of the proxy to do that.

``` + if(filter < FILTER_INVALID) { + *action_return += filter; ``` What is the addition supposed to achieve? ``` +#define CONFIG_ACTION_DUMP_NEIGHBOUR 3 +#define CONFIG_ACTION_DUMP_ROUTE 4 +#define CONFIG_ACTION_DUMP_XROUTE 5 +#define CONFIG_ACTION_DUMP_INTERFACE...

Rejected -- I'm not going to help lazy sysadmins spy on their users. (A competent sysadmin should be able to patch Polipo himself.)

@leggewie if you include this in Debian, make sure you protect against buffer overflows in `really_do_log_time`.

I've changed my mind. Reopening. (But please fix the issues with your patch.)