Jose Daniel Lara

Making the convention consistent with PowerSystems/Simulations would be a great goal @claytonpbarrows

@ccoffrin for completeness on the handling of switched shunts, I would also say that there is a small difference in results between Matpower/PSSe/PowerModels with the switch shunts as follows: 1....

> Thanks for the heads up @jd-lara! I am not super excited by either of the conventions of PSSE and Matpower as you describe them. It seems strait-forward to me...

> Thanks for the heads up @jd-lara! I am not super excited by either of the conventions of PSSE and Matpower as you describe them. It seems strait-forward to me...

We have stored the cost function as an anonymous function in PowerSystems and then just applied it to the JuMPVariable. This automatically generates the appropriate AffineExp, QuadExp or NLExp.

Maybe this will also allow to add a more friendly printing convention

@ccoffrin The short answer is that they are useful when AC models are too slow or the system is too weak to find a solution in AC. Although, with new...

I would say a Lossy DC Power Flow model based on injections is the most useful and flexible for extension. Also is a more natural follow up from the general...

solving this issue will also imply solving the `device!()` implementation to avoid interfacing with the `DeviceWrapper()`

This might be trickier than it looks since the callbacks modify the inputs. There needs to be a way to "reverse" callbacks