James Coglan

> I'd liked to use promises instead of the "callback design", but I thought it was better to mimic the code I wasn't very familiar with. You're right to notice...

> are you referring to the base revision against which the update is being applied? No, this is a replication request, so I mean that both are for the same...

@kocolosk This has prompted me to rethink how this would work for normal (`new_edits != false`) writes. For replication writes, both requests can succeed b/c replication writes can add revs...

> The question I've been mulling over for the past few minutes is whether an interactive edit conflict is detected by PARSER, or whether we have the same issue there...

This probably depends on at what point the backend decides to reject the write, and whether it does this before or after fetching the attachment bodies. If it does it...

In this context you should probably refer to Bayeux rather than Faye, since you really care about the protocol rather than the specific implementation -- lots of different implementations of...

I believe this is fixed in 2.6.8, but the problem still exists if the body is piped into a transform stream. See https://github.com/node-fetch/node-fetch/issues/1721.

Thanks for the quick response :) `sudo -u jcoglan ls` works fine, it lists the directory as normal with no errors. `/etc/sudoers` looks very vanilla; I've never knowingly modified it....

It appears that it is possible for the design doc signature to vary according to something we have not yet determined. The client's cluster that we (Neighbourhoodie) are investigating gives...

This looks really interesting, I never expected anyone to add a whole new backend to Canopy. As I'm not familiar with C# at all, this may take a while to...