William Casarin
William Casarin
The bookmark list should probably be a replaceable event type? but agreed with @fiatjaf, pins and bookmarks seem like separate concepts to me.
it's not really clear what you're proposing here or why
> Clients should query for all relevant kind 4 events. In the beginning, this might be simply all {"kinds":[4]} and later only those from follows. This doesn't seem reasonable. This...
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 08:57:46AM -0700, Leo Wandersleb wrote: >> > Clients should query for all relevant kind 4 events. In the beginning, this might be simply all...
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:13:05PM -0700, Keyan wrote: >I don't know how helpful this is, but would it be beneficial to add a standard for nested comments? >...
On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 08:28:23PM -0700, William Casarin wrote: >On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 01:13:05PM -0700, Keyan wrote: >>I don't know how helpful this is, but would...
>You mean to use the `subject` field to put the identifier that is currently suggested for the `r` tag?? ["r", "github.com/nostr-protocol/nips/pull/19"] ["subject", "Github Pull_Request 19"]
> Okay. > Btw, the `subject` field can be included in the query filter, right?? > meaning I can construct a query like: > `sub({ cb: ()=>{...} filter: [ {"subject":...
> As I mentioned in the NIP, the reason why I'm suggesting the use of something more "stable\constant" such as this, is because the URLs can change. And although this...