James Addison

> Some fields return an error when removed. Originally I thought this was related to the MANDATORY_TESTS vs OPTIONAL_TESTS but wasn't able to get to the root. Could use some...

Re-importing and re-indexing recipe content into https://www.reciperadar.com was a breeze yesterday, largely thanks to `recipe-scrapers`, and the quality of the recipe content (although not yet quantified) feels and looks pretty...

This seems as good a place as any to celebrate that `recipe-scrapers` has reached the 1000-stars milestone on GitHub :smile: :champagne: :tada:  Here's hoping for the continuation and development...

Since we don't have a mailing list for users of the library, I'm going to share this here, because hopefully people with related projects will find it useful: We now...

cc @mlduff (re: #1063, mentioning you so that you appear in the possible assignees list for this bug)

Ok, that didn't work (makes sense, I suppose). Perhaps issues can only be assigned to people who have interacted with the thread themselves (not by others on their behalf).

Interesting - thanks @mlduff! In a way I'm surprised that we haven't encountered this problem before already. To check: is is this part of the test logic that is failing:...

Ok, thanks @mlduff. I agree that option three (handling this case within test coverage) would be ideal. However, I can't initially figure out how we'd handle this in out tests....

Mmm, ok. I'm continuing to think about it. If we had one Python class per scraper unit test, then perhaps what we would naturally do here would be to override...

@mlduff please feel free to explore any possibilities; all of those options seem like they'd provide ways to learn more about the problem and possible ways to resolve it -...