James Robb

@yevdyko this is basically ready to go pending your review but I want to leave it as a draft since the README will need updated still and maybe you or...

> Thanks @jamesrweb! This looks like really good improvements. Much appreciate your efforts 🥇 > > Since this will be the new major version, maybe we can rename the main...

@yevdyko version 5 is basically ready now, please review and check the tests, documentation and see if I missed anything please! ❤️

@pd9333 can you give an example test case to show where `utcOffsetMinutesFromParts` doesn't work as intended per specification?

> Based on [wikipedia](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_zone), it looks like there are currently only two areas which are using negative offsets and has minutes > > > > | UTC offset | Location...

@pd9333 Opened PR #32 and now it is for @rtfeldman to review and merge. Really nice catch, kudos to you! 🎉

@yevdyko can you review this within the coming week please? Please also note issue #207 which is now linked appropriately in the files ready for version 4 being released once...

Once #34 is merged, the conflicts with the latest master should be resolved.

Resolved conflicts with latest `master` branch and ran `elm-format`, `prettier` and `elm-review` to check merge was successful and formatting consistent.

Conflicts are now resolved.