Jakob Kogler

E.g. look at #224, has any of these suggestions been implemented?

http://codegolf.stackexchange.com/questions/75335 It's really hard to split a sequence into pieces by a specific criterion. Not really sure how a good solution should look like. But a "split list by indices"...

Oh, right. 2016-03-11 9:02 GMT+01:00 isaacg1 [email protected]: > @jakobkogler https://github.com/jakobkogler That is the existing > functionality of c. See here: > https://pyth.herokuapp.com/?code=cG%5B1+5&debug=0 > > — > Reply to this email...

@FliiFe Yeah, `.Z` is pretty bad. Don't think anybody ever used it. But there is `."`, which compresses strings quite well.

How about a 2-char variable. (@isaacg1 Is this possible?) Alternatively `(` is available.

`(` was (or is) the tuple constructor. And tuples don't have any purpose in Pyth any more, Pyth only uses lists. When Pyth was created, some methods worked differently, when...

Pretty much agreeing with most of your points. Just a few thoughts: - A feature I really want is a shorter map notation. Currently a map is of the form...

Appening with `a`, prepending with `+`. Does work already. On May 16, 2015 5:14 AM, "isaacg1" [email protected] wrote: > This seems really awesome. > > On the subject of removing...

How about implicit for-loop variable? `FYN` instead of `FNYN` and `FYFNb` instead of `FNYFbNb`.

@Ypnypn O.k. This takes care of the `1 2 3` input format. But the other example I posted is still really painful to parse.