jaeger-operator icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
jaeger-operator copied to clipboard

Older versions of the operator and associated resources are inaccessible via links with version numbers

Open mate-szalai opened this issue 5 years ago • 6 comments

The documentation suggests that links that include version numbers can be used to install a specific version of the operator and its associated resources.

For example, the documentation here uses links such as https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/v1.17.0/deploy/crds/jaegertracing.io_jaegers_crd.yaml and https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/v1.17.0/deploy/operator.yaml.

We were using https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/v1.16.0/deploy/operator.yaml and https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/v1.16.0/deploy/crds/jaegertracing.io_jaegers_crd.yaml to pin the operator version to 1.16.0 in our deployment but we received a stealth update to v1.17.0. This broke our deployment because we were reliant on the operator monitoring all namespaces for Jaeger-related events which is no longer the default behavior starting with the v1.17.0 release.

We fixed the issue by creating local copies of all the required manifests, however, it would be a welcomed enhancement if these versioned links behaved as expected.

The issue is not specific to the v1.16.0 links. As of 04/08/20, all of the following links point to v1.17.0 of the CRD and the operator deployment:

  • https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/v1.14.0/deploy/operator.yaml

  • https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/v1.15.0/deploy/operator.yaml

  • https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/v1.16.0/deploy/operator.yaml

  • https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/v1.14.0/deploy/crds/jaegertracing.io_jaegers_crd.yaml

  • https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/v1.15.0/deploy/crds/jaegertracing.io_jaegers_crd.yaml

  • https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/v1.16.0/deploy/crds/jaegertracing.io_jaegers_crd.yaml

The ServiceAccount, Role, and RoleBinding links behave the same way as well.

For reference, we would expect v1.16.0 to point to version of these resources at this commit: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/commit/90b4053280fb230f99da4a6be5b40091d754ae43

mate-szalai avatar Apr 08 '20 18:04 mate-szalai

It seems like a bug in our release procedure.

For instance PR https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/pull/928 was merged to master and the commit got also to 1.16.0 branch https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/commits/v1.16.0.

pavolloffay avatar Apr 09 '20 08:04 pavolloffay

This line looks suspicious https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/blob/master/.ci/release.sh#L72 maybe it is pushing to all branches

pavolloffay avatar Apr 09 '20 08:04 pavolloffay

Don't you mean https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/blob/master/.ci/release.sh#L73 - looks like it is mapping the version tag to master?

objectiser avatar Apr 09 '20 08:04 objectiser

One of those seems to be causing the problem.

pavolloffay avatar Apr 09 '20 12:04 pavolloffay

Looks like it has been in since the beginning: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/commit/c5c97aea0b151b328816013b723610a90654ddc6#diff-0ade8a06d51b947d7705c1a9ae1bab59

The tags push has been in since the initial comment: https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-operator/commit/dd0cd3b537268e0fe7a670eb6edd63493735cf29#diff-0ade8a06d51b947d7705c1a9ae1bab59

We should fix before next release - but need to decode whether to update the current tags? What the implications may be (if any).

objectiser avatar Apr 09 '20 12:04 objectiser

Line 72 is about pushing local tags to the remote repository. It should only be pushing the new tag. Line 73 is pushing the commits from the new local tag to master.

I see that 1.18.0 has been released recently, and it's not pushed to the 1.16 tag. Was this issue fixed, or was the release performed using a different script?

jpkrohling avatar Jun 09 '20 08:06 jpkrohling