imd1

Hi I've downloaded https://github.com/1138-4EB/vunit/tree/petterssonmagnus-xsim and tried to run one of my existing testsuites (OK under Questasim and GHDL) using Vivado 2018.3. and I get the following compile error for a...

I'm happy to make some progress on this, but I'm not too GitHub literate, so I might need some guidance on topics such as forking and rebase in this case....

I've applied the suggested patch to string_ptr_pkg-body-2002p.vhd and now I get an error in the file that is compiled immediately after... ``` ERROR: [VRFC 10-3782] `string_ptr_pkg` is not compiled into...

> Hey @imd1 , > > This would be a killer feature if it could be implemented. > > Do you have any thoughts on how we could differentiate between...

in your example, the `if a = '0' then` is valid VHDL even though it is incomplete, so I'd want this line removed...the `-- Do something` is clearly not. So...

Separate rules makes sense... The underlying principle should be whether each commented out line is valid VHDL syntax if the `--` was removed

When malformed VHDL is processed, I'd like VSG to report this rather than some obscure traceback error

> Could you point me to these tools. I would like to understand what they can do. I'm currently on a C++ project where `clang-format` is used as a formatting...

this ticket is incorrectly assigned as User Feedback?

I think that my example is an obvious case, but your examples are less so, in the sense that the brackets do provide a documentation grouping benefit and some people...