Hugo van der Sanden

> I think [TPF](https://www.perlfoundation.org/about.html) would have to make a call on any change here, since they "carry the legal responsibility for Perl 5". I've contacted them requesting their input. They've...

> This is an extract from TPF conversation on this subject: Thanks @StuartJMackintosh, that all seems very clear. > [...] and you make an explicit statement in your documentation about...

> [Merge branch 'blead' into patch-1](https://github.com/Perl/perl5/pull/19163/commits/5ed39d46960b090d4dc08884e9e68de0490ab76a) @Yahasana That's usually an indication of an error: one usually wants to rebase one's branch over blead rather than merging blead into the branch.

As I noted elsewhere, I'm not convinced this has had the level of testing out there to justify marking it non-experimental. However I'm unclear on what the criteria really are...

@demerphq is it safe to assume this PR should be closed now, since the alternative to reduce scope of the experimental status has been merged?

> This would allocate an extra padtmp, but only in cases where LHS is not a simple padsv expression already (which honestly in most cases it probably is). In case...

I think it would also be useful to reorder things slightly for clarity: in `regcppush` have the `SSGROW()` immediately next to the `memcpy` and `SSPUSHxxx` calls (and correspondingly for `regcppop`),...

> I don't see why the static assert is needed, if we assume for argument that Size_t is 1 byte (making sizeof(regexp_paren_pair) == 3) and sizeof(*PL_savestack) is 8, then the...

> If I need to do anything - please tell me - I would like this to be pushed forward personally. I'm hoping that at some point @tonycoz will get...

Ok, I've created PR #55 with allsqrtmod support. I haven't thought too much about general roots, not sure what's involved with that. There's still a bit of duplication of effort,...