hustf
hustf
Note for when I / we pick this up: Julia issue 3327 fixed in [3591](https://github.com/JuliaLang/Pkg.jl/pull/3591) and the fix was included from Julia 1.9.4.
Oops, we ought to think this through. I have used the thread features some on Julia 1.9 and did not notice any issues.
Thank you for the quick reply and the good news. No, my instinctive reaction was to go for a Luxor issue (which paid already) . I have never understood the...
It's tempting to give package extensions a try with a PR for MathTeXENgine, but are you willing to drop Julia < 1.9 already?
Ok, I may give it a try this evening.
This method seems to work well with PR#276. If the PR is accepted roughly as is, I suggest field-testing it with a release < v4.0. If it works well, we...
Hello, femtotrader. I think I understand your dislike of do-functions. You find remnants of my own reluctance in this repository. They may mature on you, as they did for me,...
Oh, sorry, I posted an empty issue by mistake :). Well, there is plenty to read now!
As per @cormullion comment elsewhere: The only test so far follows the existing setup: A 'sample' file is included in 'runtests'. The test checks that an image file was produced....