Holger Drewes

This would still need some investigation.

Thanks a lot for reporting 😄, these kind of bugs are indeed sensitive and should be fixed! Incidentally we just had adressed exactly the same issue in one of the...

Leaving this open here a bit, in cases where people need to use private functionality I always wonder a bit if something is wrong with our API, especially in this...

Hmm, I also thought about overloading `tx.sign()`, but both of this is actually misleading, since the signature has already been created, so this is technically wrong. How about `tx.applySignature()`?

Ah no, I didn't want to put the structure in question with returning a new tx, this is just about proper naming. So my reasoning was: "signing" happens when this...

I once did this on a very at-least-there-is-something-there level, and also regarding that this is so outdated now we can very well throw a way this version of the website...

> > Eventually extract the libp2p functionality > > @holgerd77 can you clarify what is meant by `extract` here? That was a very loose first-round thought and I have no...

> We can't really remove BLS if we depend upon VM right? Then we would also have to remove it there? If we *would* decide that it's not manageable in...

Yes.

@acolytec3 not sure, has this (or: parts of this) been tackled and can the issue be closed?