Actual type is not the same as expected: [actual: RESPONSE]

[Mincol]

Actual type is not the same as expected: [actual: RESPONSE, expected: [CONTINUE_TRACE, DEBUG_AT, DEBUGGING_IN, EMPTY, EXITING_FROM, RECURSIVE_EXITING_FROM]]
com.r4intellij.debugger.exception.RUnexpectedExecutionResultTypeException: Actual type is not the same as expected: [actual: RESPONSE, expected: [CONTINUE_TRACE, DEBUG_AT, DEBUGGING_IN, EMPTY, EXITING_FROM, RECURSIVE_EXITING_FROM]]
	at com.r4intellij.debugger.function.RFunctionDebuggerBase.advance(RFunctionDebuggerBase.java:112)
	at com.r4intellij.debugger.RDebugger.continueDebug(RDebugger.java:197)
	at com.r4intellij.debugger.RDebugger.advance(RDebugger.java:115)
	at com.r4intellij.run.debug.RDebugProcess.advance(RDebugProcess.java:299)
	at com.r4intellij.run.debug.RDebugProcess.access$100(RDebugProcess.java:41)
	at com.r4intellij.run.debug.RDebugProcess$1.run(RDebugProcess.java:149)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1142)
	at java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:617)
	at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:745)

[holgerbrandl]

What did you do to cause the error?

[Mincol]

I was debugging my R script.

[Mincol]

This is minimal example which will reproduce it: cat("This will create exception")

So you need additional info?

[holgerbrandl]

No, same with me.

[daimingzhong]

I have the same problem with 2017.2.3 pycharm. Is it caused by the latest version of Jetbrain? Could it be fixed by using the older one?

[holgerbrandl]

Unfortunately, the R debugger was never ready for primetime imho. But for sure Intellij API is evolveing as well.

[benelot]

Same problem here with Intellij 2018.2.5 and R plugin 1.0.10.