Hadrien Milano

Why has this not been accepted yet? Is this project even still maintained?

If you hot-swap the bloodhound object, the HTML markup for the typeahead will be regenerated and you will lose focus, this is the expected behavior. Maybe you should look into...

Hi, I'm not sure pasting a blob of code really helps here. What I mean is that rather than focusing on implementation details, take a step back and reconsider why...

That is problematic indeed. A solution would be to use the name attribute. We could then do: ``` js $scope.$on('typeahead:select', function(evt) { console.log('clicked on ' + evt.targetScope.name); }); ``` But...

Hi there, Would you be open to reconsider this entire argument from scratch? tl;dr: Just have `is` behave exactly like `is` and forget about `instanceof` altogether. --- I think you've...

Either option 2 or 3 seem good to me. Or maybe 3, but give an option to turn off the warning for people who "know what they're doing". One major...

@0xorial Did you say that because angular's build system is so obscure and integrating a build-time transformer [involves 3rd party build tools and hacking into private members of the angular...

Hey @rawrmaan , I ended up implementing the ideas above. The result is similar to restyped, but the goal differs in the following points: - Lightweight, but not _weightless_: I...

The route handlers retain their original express signature `(req, res)`. You can use the `res` object to send a custom status code. For instance: `res.status(201)`. Note that if you chose...

No if you use the `res` object then you need to send the response body using the `res` object. The return value will be ignored.