Hilmar Lapp

@matentzn can you say where you see an attempt to veto or block a vote? I don't, but perhaps I'm missing what you're seeing. My reservations based on the critiques...

I think the only two viable contenders are to follow the preferred representation given by the DOI federation, or to use the DOI "naked", i.e., without the HTTP/HTTPS proxy, possibly...

> nt2.net doesn't resolve… Typo. The correct one is n2t.net.

The definition of `owl:versionInfo` is the following: _An owl:versionInfo statement generally has as its object a string giving information about this version, for example RCS/CVS keywords._ It sounds like what...

The advantage is to stay with published definitions of reused terms and properties as closely as possible when using shared ontologies, rather than overlaying your own definition. After all, isn't...

> > Also, your logic for finding this appropriate for axioms but not for classes ("terms") (meaning it could be appropriate for the axiom(s) defining a class but not for...

@sckott any progress or conclusions on this yet? @xu-hong is about at that step (leaving the issues with XML namespaces aside). Suggestions as to additional decorations that should be added...

> Common fields among functions that could be standardized: You mean _columns among data frames_?

> name - taxonomic name - combine any separate fields to make this one (not done yet), could be additional name columns @sckott do you mean the classification, or family...

Good suggestion, @mr-c. It hasn't been on our priority list recently, but I've indeed been wondering how best to wrap this up.