Leandro Hermida

I added to the query filter `cases.samples.portions.state == "released"` but that had no affect, the portions with NULL metadata rows, NULL linked analytes, and NA state.... i.e. not really attached...

Thanks @seandavi, though for some reason I cannot reopen the issue. The OP feature request still holds? What is the `filter` syntax from `IS MISSING` and `NOT MISSING` operators in...

If my previous response is a valid feature request please re-open the issue, though if not and I'm "missing" something (pun intended!) pls tell me

Using a `collections.namedtuple` data structure for the wildcards seems to be the problem: https://github.com/snakemake/snakemake/blob/main/snakemake/io.py#L1302

@johanneskoester I think this is fixed in the latest docs and can be closed

@jmeppley maybe write the slow part as a Cython function? I found Cython to be pretty easy to use and it integrates very easily and seamlessly into your Python code....

Hi @johanneskoester and Snakemake team - sorry to bug, do you have any word on this? It's a bug that is pretty impacting, that snakemake is always re-executing (sometimes time-consuming)...

Looking at the simpler complete example in the OP might help better troubleshoot, not sure why it keeps saying `Input files updated by another job: ` for all `` after...

Sorry to complain... hope this will get fixed at some point soon because it's a pretty major regression. Causing me issues currently because I have a very large snakemake workflow...

I list `snakemake --list-input-changes --list-code-changes --list-params-changes --list-untracked --list-version-changes` and there's *nothing*, yet snakemake wants to re-run so many rules, really this is a serious bug to a fundamental part of...