Harim Kang

> During the regression tests, I got the error below, I'll investigate this issue also. BTW, @harimkang, do you have any advice ? It seems that it's related to the...

I think this is unintentionally showing the wrong error message, I'll take a look.

My guess is that the merge of this PR (https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/training_extensions/pull/2251) should have resolved the issue. Could you please double check and close it?

> Overall, the proposed solution just shows slightly different error, but anyway the failure with an exception occurs. I was wondering if it is possible to fix this at the...

https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/anomalib/pull/2065 - With the merge of this PR, the feature is complete as an Anomalib 1.1 target.

> Hi @harimkang , thank you for your feedback. It's a great suggestion. I think we can pass it through the `cfg` parameters. Here's an example below. > > >...

I think https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/anomalib/blob/28e023ea88cda9a41d284e6fd2ac5d5e7fdb66f2/tools/upgrade/config.py#L212 and https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/anomalib/blob/28e023ea88cda9a41d284e6fd2ac5d5e7fdb66f2/tools/upgrade/config.py#L239 are missing items in v1 config. I think this should no longer be supported. Can you please check? @ashwinvaidya17 cc. @samet-akcay

> Here is the interesting behavior of integration tests that shows the impact of one test on another. Ideally, test instances should run independently so I'm afraid there's some deep...

A release branch has been created, so please retarget to `releases/2.0.0`

https://github.com/openvinotoolkit/training_extensions/pull/3489 - merged