Dominik Gresch

A full reproducing example for this issue can be found here: https://github.com/greschd/sphinx-autodoc-typehints-confusion

This immediate issue could be resolved with the following patch ```diff diff --git a/sphinx/util/inspect.py b/sphinx/util/inspect.py index c925485e1..8c90ccb10 100644 --- a/sphinx/util/inspect.py +++ b/sphinx/util/inspect.py @@ -666,6 +666,11 @@ def signature( localns =...

In a more complex example, I have observed that `napoleon_attr_annotations = True` also has the effect of overwriting the annotations; this may need a similar treatment.

> So we must wait for pyvista 0.44.3. PyVista `0.45.0` with support for Python 3.13 has been released 🎉

Should something like the following also be accepted? ```python surf.add_field_data( [0, 1, 2], name="cell_data_int", ) ``` If so, I guess it would need to be a type based on [`numpy.typing.ArrayLike`](https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/typing.html#numpy.typing.ArrayLike).

Thanks @ConradJohnston for the improvement! @sphuber Should we really close this issue though, or was that just done automatically/accidentally because the PR mentions this issue? To add to my initial...

Yeah that was on alpha, glad to hear that should now be fixed. True, the scheduling definitely isn't an easy fix. Another option (maybe as temporary fix) would also be...

Should we continue discussing here, and you'll collect it there? Or edit there directly? > The problem with this is that the parent would then not be able to receive...

I'm not entirely sure if this is just a documentation issue, or if there is a fixable bug (or several) hidden here somewhere. A few observations: - The immediate reason...

> Also, AFAIK, there were some concerns raised by @greschd in regards to moving to 5.X yet (due to versions shipped internally by Ansys if I am not mistaken). That...