[Bug] graphman drop sgdXXX results in all deployments with same deployment hash being dropped

[datanexus-vincent]

Bug report

In an attempt to drop one deployment with multiple copies, I used graphman drop. The confirmation made no mention that multiple deployments were going to be removed, but both deployments were removed when I confirmed. Is this expected behavior? Because it doesn't seem like it from the user perspective.

Relevant log output

$ graphman --config graph_node_config.toml drop sgd1591
Found 1 deployment(s) to remove:
name       | indexer-agent/yGw4wgaMhW
deployment | QmTMKqty5yZvZtB3SwzXUG92aZUH1YQw3VjByGw4wgaMhW

Continue? [y/N] y
unassigning QmTMKqty5yZvZtB3SwzXUG92aZUH1YQw3VjByGw4wgaMhW[1591]
Removing subgraph indexer-agent/yGw4wgaMhW
Recording unused deployments. This might take a while.
id        | 603
shard     | arbitrum
namespace | sgd603
subgraphs | 
entities  | 4117337
----------+-------------------------------------------------------------------
id        | 1591
shard     | arbitrum_vip
namespace | sgd1591
subgraphs | 
entities  | 4859231
Recorded 2 unused deployments
====================================    1 ====================================
removing sgd603 from arbitrum
   deployment id: QmTMKqty5yZvZtB3SwzXUG92aZUH1YQw3VjByGw4wgaMhW
        entities: 4117337
done removing sgd603 from arbitrum in 2.2s

====================================    2 ====================================
removing sgd1591 from arbitrum_vip
   deployment id: QmTMKqty5yZvZtB3SwzXUG92aZUH1YQw3VjByGw4wgaMhW
        entities: 4859231
done removing sgd1591 from arbitrum_vip in 1.0s

IPFS hash

No response

Subgraph name or link to explorer

No response

Some information to help us out

• [ ] Tick this box if this bug is caused by a regression found in the latest release.
• [ ] Tick this box if this bug is specific to the hosted service.
• [X] I have searched the issue tracker to make sure this issue is not a duplicate.

OS information

Linux

[suntzu93]

You can remove a single namespace using the following commands:

1. graphman unassign sgdxxx
2. graphman unused record
3. graphman unused remove

[matthewdarwin]

Hau (Pinax) ran into this bug in December. Tehn (another indexer) ran into this bug today.

[cryptovestor21]

Just adding some signal to this. It would be great if we could get this fixed as soon as possible. It's a major setback when subgraphs that takes months to sync are lost to bugs.

[github-actions[bot]]

Looks like this issue has been open for 6 months with no activity. Is it still relevant? If not, please remember to close it.