Support for endBlock in subgraph defs

[jamesmorgan]

We often replace/retire contracts but still want to index the events/transactions from these older unused contracts.

Would be great if there was a endBlock we could define which would allow us to set a definitive data to stop indexing contracts from.

Would save time/resources maintaining checks for things which are no longer used.

Thanks for an awesome product 🙏

[PaulRBerg]

This would be great! We're triggering way many more event handlers than we would if we had an endBlock setting.

[froid1911]

Same applies to us. The feature would also be good for testing specific handlers in specific intervals without indexing the entire chain.

[friskyfoxdk]

Bump, this would be a very useful feature to add

[danaugrs]

Any updates on this? This would be very useful for us.

[TobyKreiselmaier]

This would be a life-saver for us as well!

[schmidsi]

Thanks for the ping folks and sorry for the silence. This seems like a low hanging fruit to me but I might be wrong. I'll forward this to the graph-node team to make sure it gets added to the backlog.

I would also like to add the feature request to be able to stop indexing of certain contracts created with data source templates.

[vibern0]

Hey. Also interested. As mentioned before, wan't to stop for former contracts. And also some other activity, that continues to be indexed in new contracts, but muuuuch more efficiently now.

[zfogg]

+1 would love this

[jurrchen]

+1 this would be fantastic.