Enhance Diff Application and Error Transparency

[similato87]

PR Description

Background

Users currently face issues with partial diff applications where the system silently discards unapplied sections. This results in non-functional code without any indication of failure, requiring manual verification for each diff.

Proposed Solution

Enhanced Error Reporting: To assist in manual correction, the system will output errors more comprehensively. Invalid sections of diffs will be printed in detail to both the console and a debug file, providing clear guidance on what went wrong.

Technical Details

The problem was primarily with the diff validation failing to handle specific hunks. This failure was compounded by inadequate error outputs, which did not provide the full context necessary for manual intervention.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:

Project coverage is 70.57%. Comparing base (93198a5) to head (1bb4887). Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

:exclamation: Current head 1bb4887 differs from pull request most recent head 46cfacd. Consider uploading reports for the commit 46cfacd to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1138      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   70.40%   70.57%   +0.16%     
==========================================
  Files          31       31              
  Lines        1737     1733       -4     
==========================================
  Hits         1223     1223              
+ Misses        514      510       -4     

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[similato87]

Hello @TheoMcCabe,

I've enhanced the system to provide detailed outputs for invalid hunks. Now, each hunk will either be parsed successfully or be printed with a reason for failure.

I've included your specific case in our tests; interestingly, it works perfectly. You can review the improved file output at Test function on the corresponding branch. This is the chat file I am currently using: Theo Case Chat. Feel free to modify parts of the chat file to manually generate an invalid hunk for testing purposes.

Please let me know if this resolves the issues with the Docker file and the silent failing diffs.