Gregory P. Smith

merged for 3.14. Now considering if we can apply a version of that PR to bugfix releases such as 3.13.1 and 3.12.8.

> @gpshead, do you have any update on the consideration? > Should I dig into this? I haven't had time, feel free to dig in.

A more fundamental issue behind this: unittest's plain text verbose output is not intended to be parsable and consumable by machines. It is 22 years old and was intended for...

For consideration as a security related backport. To trigger these, people already need the ability to run arbitrary Python code. So we don't consider this a vulnerability given the existing...

Thanks for authoring, reviewing, and merging. I agree with @encukou's analysis.

SC review status: still on our radar, we're catching up on the latest in the Discuss thread before we can make any decisions.

There's no need to ask me about anything in this repo anymore. go/epitaphs/gps _(Fixing the license to be what makes sense for documentation makes sense to me but I have...

Thanks! I'm pulling these in internally and will include them in a future push. I've never heard @ called pie notation so I'm letting the internet decide: https://twitter.com/gpshead/status/1136373118044217344