Implement renameat2(2) for real
fixes #7895
Tests added. Should be ok. @hbhasker @avagin
pls add more details in the commit message. Right now, it is not clear what this change implements. It seems that this change adds the support of the RENAME_EXCHANGE flag for gofer file systems. What is about overlay and tmpfs?
@avagin I can add to other fs too, if that's needed.
I can also discuss adding RENAME_WHITEOUT to all of them, if needed, but it looks like MKNOD capability is prohibited anyway?
Sorry for the delay, will rework it and resubmit with the proposed changes
@ayushr2 I can add tmpfs in another PR, is it ok? I'm pretty much ready with a new code for gofer that fixes all the comments.
@pkit Yes adding tmpfs support should be a separate PR.
Feel free to push your new changes for review.
@ayushr2 pushed new version Has some preparation for other fs tests in test cases
A friendly reminder that this PR had no activity for 120 days.
This PR has been closed due to lack of activity.