googletest issues

Deep comparison between objects

5

I was interested to see if there are solutions to compare deeply nested structs in C++ where differences in the structs are clearly highlighted on failure. This is something that...

Denis-Gavrielov

enhancement

Add Instant leak check option

2

This PR adds functionality to instantly invoke a mock object leak check (as currently already done at program end) in order to provide a more fine grained leak check over...

Matthdonau

Markdown documentation table of contents

6

Hi, First off thank you for this fantastic project. I often find myself going through the gtest or gmock markdowns and wishing there was a TOC at the beginning. Is...

bricoletc

How to use EqualsProto to check protobuf?

20

The [advanced doc](https://github.com/google/googletest/blame/master/googletest/docs/advanced.md#L407) says `you can use gMock's EqualsProto to compare protos in your tests`, but I find the `EqualsProto` is **not** defined inside gMock but in the nucleus repo...

yangminzhu

[FR]: Support explicit checking for leaked mock objects

### Does the feature exist in the most recent commit? No. ### Why do we need this feature? This proposal is a reintroduction of #561. Our team at Microsoft is...

blueset

enhancement

[FR]: Document that parameters used in parametrized tests must implement operator<<

### Does the feature exist in the most recent commit? No ### Why do we need this feature? To clarify the usage of parametrized tests and avoid Valgrind warnings. ###...

carlosgalvezp

enhancement

Uninteresting call to ON_CALL method

8

I have read https://github.com/google/googletest/blob/master/googlemock/docs/CookBook.md#knowing-when-to-expect and understand and agree with the motivation behind uninteresting calls. However, even though I have added an ```ON_CALL(Foo, Bar).WillByDefault(Return());``` I get a uninteresting mock function call...

LiSongMWO