Githoniel

I have finished CI migration, update type definition and readme. Github actions did not trigger on this PR but it work well in my fork. check https://github.com/githoniel/webpack-chain/actions I think it...

@edmorley I have create https://github.com/neutrinojs/webpack-chain/pull/304

conflict resolved and all test pass now

@edmorley do you have time to review this? my fork version [@gem-mine/webpack-chain](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@gem-mine/webpack-chain) of this pr has been used in our private cli and work well

@JaxXu thanks for testing. I have fixed it

> @githoniel > Can `webpack-dev-server` be upgraded to v4 together？ > I noticed this remark: > https://github.com/githoniel/webpack-chain/blob/bdbdb85c4338200ef9fbd8108d5709431a6f8cae/types/index.d.ts#L245-L246 > > The complete migration plan is here: > https://github.com/webpack/webpack-dev-server/blob/master/migration-v4.md thank you for...

@0x1af2aec8f957 It should be `assetModuleFilename` not `assetModuleFilenamet` ?

> Hi! Thank you for your work on this, and sorry for the delay in taking a look at it. > > The PR is pretty large at the moment...

@concubicycle how is your work now? I will implement it because my company's project also needs this

> > @concubicycle how is your work now? > > I will implement it because my company's project also needs this > > Ah, my bad, I've been really busy...