Deleted user

Results 135433 comments of Deleted user

so are @hoonman how goes things?

The output of this query against Apache Pluto 3.0.0 can be found at [this link](https://lgtm.com/query/4416051262899679087/). Please note the query runs against my fork of Pluto as I couldn't get LGTM...

@Marcono1234 I have squashed the commits and included some suggestions from the review. RE: "verb" vs "methods": I can see that the standard calls it a method but the attack...

@smowton Your ideas woud reduce the FP's. but I am still concerned with the number of results. Hence, I am keeping this one on hold for a while. Please give...

Yeah this would be fantastic!

No, Deno can successfully type-check your code. (I had to adjust your first import, `import { ResponseFormatJSONSchema } from "openai/resources/shared.ts";`)

I had used a serving.properties file which has the following configurations 1 engine=MPI 2 option.task=text-generation 3 option.trust_remote_code=true 4 option.tensor_parallel_degree=1 5 option.model_id={{model_id}} 6 option.dtype=fp16 7 option.tgi_compat=true 8 option.rolling_batch=lmi-dist My endpoint config...

I have mentioned the sample prompt in the issue description. Mentioning below again for reference: """[INST] Respond only with the answer and do not provide any explanation or additional text....

如果是UDP 53端口被阻断,这种情况下无法单纯的判断是什么方面的问题,因为UDP 53端口通常情况下是只会传输数据量很小的明文DNS解析数据包。传输其他流量有很大概率是会被怀疑的。 这种情况下被阻断还有可能是被ISP级别判断为这属于DNS隐秘隧道行为或者是DDOS攻击了,您可以参阅这里了解更多: DNS隐秘隧道: 它是什么 https://joker-vip.github.io/2023/05/25/DNS%E9%9A%90%E8%97%8F%E9%9A%A7%E9%81%93%E6%A3%80%E6%B5%8B%E7%9A%84%E6%96%B0%E6%80%9D%E8%B7%AF/#:~:text=DNS%E9%9A%90%E8%97%8F%E9%9A%A7%E9%81%93%E6%98%AF%E4%B8%80,%E9%9A%90%E8%94%BD%E6%80%A7%E5%92%8C%E7%81%B5%E6%B4%BB%E6%80%A7%E3%80%82 僵尸网络 DNS 隐蔽隧道检测方法与实践 http://www.tup.tsinghua.edu.cn/upload/books/yz/094348-01.pdf 利用DNS进行DDOS攻击: 什么是DNS攻击: https://brightsec.com/blog/dns-attack/ https://www.mozhedun.com/news/industry-news/59019.html

why not make it the default behavior instead of it being optional?