Deleted user

We could try and make the shebangs more dynamic for every script via making a function in common-script depending on the distribution. Only in theory though I would have to...

> > the shebang update looks redundant and could worsen performance, not sure why you think the shebang is getting ignored when its not? > > Before this PR, commands...

arch-titus does completely rely on bashisms though this shouldnt matter since you should be executing it in a live iso

scripts dont need be written in bash, a lot of the time you can completely write it in posix, not affecting any functionality at all as seen with the current...

> > no not really.. linutil is supposed to be posix complaint. > > Linutil is a TUI, for now, wrapping a collection of scripts. It doesn't necessitate POSIX compliance....

> > > Before this PR, commands are directly launched with sh. It's not sh -e, although that would be an easy fix. > > > > > > Oh,...

> > arch-titus does completely rely on bashisms though this shouldnt matter since you should be executing it in a live iso > > The only reason why this works...

> > > > no not really.. linutil is supposed to be posix complaint. > > > > > > > > > Linutil is a TUI, for now, wrapping...

> > > > > Before this PR, commands are directly launched with sh. It's not sh -e, although that would be an easy fix. > > > > >...

> > > > > > no not really.. linutil is supposed to be posix complaint. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >...