Gabriele Bartolini

I had totally missed this issue. We will look into it ASAP. Thanks.

> facing this too, using following: > > ``` > apiVersion: v1 > kind: PersistentVolume > metadata: > name: postgres-0 > spec: > capacity: > storage: 1Gi > accessModes: >...

I don't remember the criteria we used back then to determine which options to enable and which not to. I think we initially decided to take a conservative approach. A...

Thanks @fullykubed. Except for the `so_reuseport` (which I would not allow for now), the proposed options look OK to me. Please proceed with a patch. Thanks.

Hi @fullykubed, have you by any chance prepared a patch for this? Thanks!

> [@gbartolini](https://github.com/gbartolini) Just confirming whether you want this back ported (no pref on my end). I notice the label and associated milestones seem to conflict. We are trying now to...

Up for a PR? :)

I think we are now in a position where we should enable users to perform this operation, at their own risk and danger. We should document this properly. Any thoughts?

Anyone interested contributing to this?

Superseded by #6266