Fabian Steeg

After looking at this, I now think https://github.com/hbz/lobid-gnd/issues/229, like this here, is actually about using the generic property (abbreviatedName there, temporaryName here), and filling it with values that in the...

Yes, good catch! We only had `temporaryName` (which [isn't used](https://lobid.org/gnd/search?q=temporaryName%3A*) in the data). Added the specific ones in https://github.com/hbz/lobid-gnd/commit/bd52135562e0c5a6a02fba259986fb7957e0eb60.

It seems they no longer have that URL in the title or elsewhere (see one [ProvenanceCharacteristic](http://lobid.org/gnd/1085154025), [all](http://lobid.org/gnd/search?filter=%2B%28type%3AProvenanceCharacteristic%29)).

> Currently, we don't add any data ourselves but use the depiction information from [EntityFacts](https://www.dnb.de/EN/entityfacts). We don't add anything, but we actually create our own, simple `depiction` object from the...

> This would definitely be more work than just adding the additional fields, wouldn't it? No, I don't think so. We already create that HTML. We could remove the Wikidata...

The DNB repository does not seem to provide that information. It declares its level of support for deletions as `transient`, which means "the repository does not guarantee that a list...

Deployed to test, see e.g. https://test.lobid.org/gnd/118903489 (below the table, shortened to the day).

Yes, makes sense. I tried moving the date to associate it with the DNB LDS, but it keeps being confusing, not just due to the 'it's the MARC, not the...

> These changes are now coming in and start to make problems [...] This was just a temporary config issue on the server, statements leading to non-compacted fields are now...

> Use generic abbreviatedName property insted of specific ones I think we should add the generic property but retain the specific ones, which seem to be still used instead of...