wtfos-configurator icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
wtfos-configurator copied to clipboard

Architecture weirdness: Package msp-osd version 0.2.0 has no valid architecture, ignoring.

Open j005u opened this issue 3 years ago • 5 comments

root@pigeon_wm170_gls:/ # opkg info dinit
Package msp-osd version 0.2.0 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Package: dinit
Version: 0.14.0
...

msp-osd seems to install fine and I didn't notice any issues before executing an unrelated opkg command and that warning showed up. Still, might need investigating in case it ends up causing issues down the line.

j005u avatar Jun 20 '22 08:06 j005u

Same here. If the package manager is ignoring some packages, then I guess not all updates are getting through:

Package avin-mods version 1.0.2 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Package fan-control version 0.1.1 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Package goggle-led-draw version 0.2.0 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Package image-changer version 1.0.2 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Package image-configurator version 1.0.2 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Package live-audio version 1.0.0 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Package msp-osd version 0.7.2 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Package tweak-enable-debug-menu version 0.1.5 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Package tweak-prevent-force-upgrade version 0.9.3 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Package wtfos version 0.3.4 has no valid architecture, ignoring.
Upgrading wtfos-package-config on root from 0.1.0 to 0.1.1...
Downloading http://repo.fpv.wtf/pigeon/wtfos-package-config_0.1.1_pigeon-all.ipk
Configuring wtfos-package-config.
Everything up to date!```

cmanley avatar Oct 28 '22 20:10 cmanley

Are you running this on the AU/Vista? If so I think this is correct, it's ignoring packages targeted at the goggles.

bri3d avatar Oct 28 '22 20:10 bri3d

Yes, a Caddx Vista. Isn't msp-osd also targeted towards the air module too?

cmanley avatar Oct 28 '22 20:10 cmanley

There are two msp-osd packages. I believe that the one with the wrong architecture was skipped and the one with the correct architecture should be selected instead.

bri3d avatar Oct 28 '22 20:10 bri3d

Ah ok then ik makes sense. It does remain weird/confusing though.

cmanley avatar Oct 28 '22 20:10 cmanley