Ferran Basora

Could you checkout `feature/slow` branch and test it with 1 iteration, please? This is going to show where the time is spent during a request.

Thanks! I'm going to review this data.

I have been working lately on a branch to introduce async/await futures in drill. This will bring better performance for the use case you mentioned. You can review it here:...

@wizzardo Can you run the same test without `rampup`? This period of time is counted in `Time taken for tests` and `Requests per second`. Also, it could be cool to...

Thanks @wizzardo for all this information! As soon as we merge the async branch and then we merge the keep-alive(https://github.com/fcsonline/drill/commit/e6b51ffbfecf68f9f5265d54c74e1091a2e10599) I think we will be in a really good throughput...

Async and keep-alive features have been merged to master. Can you test again?

Are you trying with the last changes in master? They include async and keep alive (avoid multiple dns resolutions) functionalities that should improve those cases. BTW, remove the `rampup` option...

I think that the best option is to show a label like "4 files" and some kind of icon representing a multiple file selection. Then when you click on add...

Thanks Daniel! I will try it.

I'm totally agree about the compatibility check, however I just created a PR to mitigate this issue. https://github.com/Rovak/InlineAttachment/pull/31