Different brands and logos - Duplicates okay?

[ideamatrix]

trafficstars

I'm working on some updates in Toolbox, and am wondering whether it makes sense to have separate entries when it would be more clear to users.

As an example, Dell Children's Medical Group (Outpatient) in Austin, TX is owned by the Seton Outpatient division of Ascension and shares the same Athena portal, but brands itself differently from its Ascension parent. Ascension's ownership is certainly not a secret, but as Fasten grows over time and is used by a much wider audience than tech nerds like myself, it would be helpful for users to see the Dell Children's name and logo when selecting sources. Essentially, nobody is going to search for "Ascension" when looking for "Dell Children's". Just one example of many that likely exist.

My vote would be to keep two separate source entries for clarity and better UX, but with some boundaries, Checking to see if there's agreement before I spend much time updating a bunch of names, NPI's and logos in Toolbox.

[AnalogJ]

Hey @ideamatrix Agreed, we need to show the patient facing brands where possible. Duplicates are completely acceptable.