VM test runner rewrite

[am1r021]

This change aims to modernize the vm test runners by switching over from using tape to vitest, refining the test file reader, and dropping any unused features or parameters of the current test runners.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

:x: Patch coverage is 0% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 75.45%. Comparing base (a8d3faa) to head (17d062c). :warning: Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Flag	Coverage Δ
block	88.43% <ø> (ø)
blockchain	88.85% <ø> (ø)
common	93.38% <ø> (ø)
evm	62.01% <ø> (ø)
mpt	90.11% <ø> (-0.50%)	:arrow_down:
rlp	?
statemanager	78.10% <ø> (ø)
static	91.35% <ø> (ø)
tx	88.07% <ø> (ø)
util	84.94% <ø> (ø)
vm	65.08% <0.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:

• :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[gabrocheleau]

@holgerd77 this seems like a good candidate for wrapping up and merging in. Wdyt? Could look ino it and see if we can get it done, the tape->vitest migration in general seems like a good direction

[holgerd77]

Yes, that's the one I was talking about.