Erwan Gouriou

> @de-nordic, @erwango Do you mean that decl_nph = 2 whatever CONFIG_MISRA_SANE, so that JESD216_SFDP_SIZE is no more a function of nph ? Yes

> A proposal could be to define two macro > > ``` > #define JESD216_SFDP_SIZE_1 (sizeof(struct jesd216_sfdp_header) \ > + ((1) * sizeof(struct jesd216_param_header))) > ``` > > ``` >...

> @de-nordic Is that fine to you ? Gentle ping @de-nordic

@de-nordic Just for the sake of the discussion. There was an alternative proposal [here](https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/65813#issuecomment-1929874828) aim was to have only one version of the macro (ie not depending on MISRA enabled...

Superseded by https://github.com/zephyrproject-rtos/zephyr/pull/72990

@loicpoulain Would you mind having a look ?

@CharlesDias Do you think this point can be closed ?

ok, sure. Maybe you want to update the TODO list above then.

Moving the prio from Medium to low as: - Specific use case on specific series (not all use cases impacted nor all the series ) - Issue only visible with...

@FRASTM, can you check in datasheet if Sysclock @ 128MHz is compatible with use case ?