Eric Hanson

> Do you know of examples in the wild where the type hierarchy would clash? No, I don't. > But right now I think a supertype like https://github.com/FluxML/Flux.jl/pull/2028 might be...

Can it be dual-licensed? Perhaps it can be licensed under both the title-17 license and another license like 1BSD or MIT? (My understanding is that dual licensing allows the user...

So looking at https://github.com/JuliaRegistries/General/pull/48131#issuecomment-960666031, licensecheck was able to identify the license as NIST-PD-fallback as you pointed out. That license is not OSI-approved, so even though RegistryCI could identify the license,...

I am not very familiar with the `predict_*` functions; is it ever more than just post-processing `predict`? Anyway, I do see `operations` is passed into `evaluate!` so maybe that can...

No, I just want to do my own evaluation on the predictions. In this case, I have multichannel data, and my model is trained to work on each channel independently....

I think the are still some left on v0.7, btw: ```julia julia> using RollingFunctions, Aqua julia> Aqua.test_unbound_args(RollingFunctions) Test Failed at /Users/eph/.julia/packages/Aqua/HWLbM/src/unbound_args.jl:10 Expression: detect_unbound_args_recursively(m) == [] Evaluated: Any[running(fun2::Function, data1::V, data2::V, windowspan::Int64,...

Ah, I hadn't read the note carefully enough and did mix up NTFS and NFS. Consider this a bug report then: Revise does not work for me on the new...

No, it just silently didn’t update. And during my debugging attempts, I saw `src` folder of the package I was trying to revise was correctly listed in `Revise.watched_files`, so I...

> does Julia identify as `Sys.islinux()`? Yep: ``` julia> Sys.islinux() true julia> versioninfo() Julia Version 1.4.2 Commit 44fa15b150* (2020-05-23 18:35 UTC) Platform Info: OS: Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-6700K...

> However, `make`ing Julia may have revealed a clue: it gave me warnings about clock skew. I'll try fixing that and test out revise again tomorrow. So I checked with...