Shane Freeder

This has already been considered and somewhat planned however is not a high priority nor do I recall if we ever came to a real conclusion on this due to...

(saving data is also not really a huge concern to us at this point as CF caches all of our jars anyways)

There was internal talks about this time ago, I believe that there was some concerns in regards to its maturity as well as the potential noise it would introduce in...

This is a weird area where pruning much of the time is generally somewhat of an idea given how we rip the tree apart so violently, but, those loose objects...

You don't add those attributes via the proxy, attributes aren't transmitted over the connection, from what I recall, it's basically just a K,V store on the connection, but, that's set...

I've yet to get around to looking over the new protocol, still on the mend from my health issues, sloowly getting there, needless to say, stuff like this is on...

sounds like it would just leave us in the exact same state of affairs, but, with some level of "we support 1.14+", unless I'm missing something with the older system,...

I believe that the best route, which I'm pretty sure we talked to lex about, would be to basically have a server switch packet, the only real caveat is making...

See, personally, am not too sure about the UUID, i guess it works, would just need to be exposed in the API, I was more thinking potentially something which can...

a full reconnect is what I was proposing to lex, given that it offers a cleaner state, just there would need to be some form of token passed