vse-sim
                                
                                 vse-sim copied to clipboard
                                
                                    vse-sim copied to clipboard
                            
                            
                            
                        Import Jameson Quinn's VSE Sim fork
Check out this pull request on  
See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB
Sourcery Code Quality Report
❌ Merging this PR will decrease code quality in the affected files by 9.94%.
| Quality metrics | Before | After | Change | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Complexity | 10.56 🙂 | 25.92 😞 | 15.36 👎 | 
| Method Length | 65.75 🙂 | 84.00 🙂 | 18.25 👎 | 
| Working memory | 7.24 🙂 | 10.57 😞 | 3.33 👎 | 
| Quality | 62.04% 🙂 | 52.10% 🙂 | -9.94% 👎 | 
| Other metrics | Before | After | Change | 
|---|---|---|---|
| Lines | 1915 | 3200 | 1285 | 
| Changed files | Quality Before | Quality After | Quality Change | 
|---|---|---|---|
| dataClasses.py | 78.68% ⭐ | 77.21% ⭐ | -1.47% 👎 | 
| methods.py | 46.23% 😞 | 42.58% 😞 | -3.65% 👎 | 
| mydecorators.py | 78.84% ⭐ | 79.88% ⭐ | 1.04% 👍 | 
| stratFunctions.py | 83.12% ⭐ | 88.25% ⭐ | 5.13% 👍 | 
| voterModels.py | 74.14% 🙂 | 74.78% 🙂 | 0.64% 👍 | 
| vse.py | 59.95% 🙂 | 25.94% 😞 | -34.01% 👎 | 
Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:
| File | Function | Complexity | Length | Working Memory | Quality | Recommendation | 
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| methods.py | V321.stratBallotFor | 52 ⛔ | 469 ⛔ | 5.23% ⛔ | Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods | |
| vse.py | threeRoundResults | 40 ⛔ | 1131 ⛔ | 34 ⛔ | 6.01% ⛔ | Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions | 
| methods.py | makeSTARMethod | 161 ⛔ | 1308 ⛔ | 16 ⛔ | 7.41% ⛔ | Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions | 
| methods.py | makeScoreMethod | 54 ⛔ | 881 ⛔ | 15 😞 | 11.05% ⛔ | Refactor to reduce nesting. Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions | 
| methods.py | V321.results | 11 🙂 | 342 ⛔ | 16 ⛔ | 32.45% 😞 | Try splitting into smaller methods. Extract out complex expressions | 
Legend and Explanation
The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:
- ⭐ excellent
- 🙂 good
- 😞 poor
- ⛔ very poor
The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.
Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.
We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!
Help us improve this quality report!
@ragconsumer Can you resolve the conflicts so we can merge it?
@ragconsumer Can you resolve the conflicts so we can merge it?
Full disclosure: I have no experience handling pull requests of any appreciable size, and I don't see any options for debugging that would prevent the disaster I anticipate when all the code is combined. The old VSE code was absolutely hideous, and I foresee problems when incorporating anything that was based on it. My approach would be to dump the old code altogether and switch to using only the code on Jameson's branch. I can try resolving the conflicts manually if you want, but I expect something to break. By the way, I'm coding a new version in Julia that should make this obsolete in a few months.
Honestly whatever you want to do with it sounds good to me. Happy to update the website however you see fit. You're the experts.