raytracer
raytracer copied to clipboard
edin
Performance comparison of various compilers
About
Raytracer benchmarks based on Typescript sample.
Results
| Language / Compiler | Time [ms] |
|---|---|
| Nim | 130 ms |
| C++ (GCC) | 160 ms |
| Fortran | 160 ms |
| C (GCC) | 160 ms |
| Crystal | 190 ms |
| D (LDC) | 210 ms |
| Rust | 220 ms |
| C (MSVC) | 250 ms |
| C++ (MSVC) | 250 ms |
| VB.NET | 360 ms |
| C# | 360 ms |
| Delphi XE6 | 390 ms |
| Odin | 450 ms |
| Go | 460 ms |
| D (DMD) | 500 ms |
| Java 8-14 | 600 ms |
| Delphi 2010 (32 bit) | 720 ms |
| Node 15 (JS) | 734 ms |
| Julia | 783 ms |
| Scala | 820 ms |
| Node 15 (TS) | 1100 ms |
| F# | 1800 ms |
| Node 8 | 1800 ms |
| PHP (PHP 8.0) | 7450 ms |
| HHVM | 11000 ms |
| PHP (PHP 7.4) | 24500 ms |
| PHP (PHP 7.3) | 23500 ms |
| PHP (PHP 7.0) | 25500 ms |
| Ruby 2.6 | 37600 ms |
| Ruby 2.2 | 47800 ms |
| Python 3.7 | 61000 ms |
| Python 3.5 | 68000 ms |
| PHP (PHP 5.6) | 83000 ms |
| Zig | ? ms |
| V | ? ms |
| Swift | ? ms |
| Haskel | ? ms |
| Ada | ? ms |
Lines of code
| Language | Loc |
|---|---|
| Python | 275 |
| F# | 300 |
| Ruby | 351 |
| Julia | 360 |
| Nim | 379 |
| Typescript | 412 |
| C# | 426 |
| Swift | 450 |
| C++ | 461 |
| VB.NET | 481 |
| D | 490 |
| PHP | 491 |
| Go | 529 |
| C | 560 |
| Fortran | 565 |
| Java | 569 |
| Delphi | 678 |
Comments:
C - Simple, clean, and fast
C++ - Unlike C, C++ version does bounds checking, otherwise, performances are mostly the same
Nim - Uses Quake square root algorithm
Delphi2010 - Uses old 32 bit compiler
Node/V8 - Node is fast
F# - This should be close to C# and VB.Net, but I don't have much experience with F#
Tested On
Tested on AMD FX-8120 Cpu.
edin