David P. Sanders
David P. Sanders
Note that the mechanism itself is still the same: globally redefine all functions according to the selected mode. There does not seem to be a workable alternative to this.
@Kolaru Thanks for the feedback. I agree that having a do-block syntax would be good for testing purposes. I'm not sure I'll manage that in this PR though.
And probably other rounding modes, yes.
I'm not sure what happened but there are now lots of other commits included in this PR. Could you please rebase against master?
The question is if this affects anything somewhere else in some function that checks `signbit` to see if a number is negative. We are coming up against limits of Julia's...
Isn't the new `interval_signbit` the same as the `sign` function for an `Interval`?
Is this ready to merge? I confirm it fixes the `show` bug for complex intervals.
Does a qr decompositon actually make sense for interval matrices? What does it mean for two interval vectors to be orthogonal?
I'm not sure what you mean by "cannot be solved" here.
I actually quite like the solution in `NumberIntervals`. It's a clever way of introducing a 3-valued logic by returning `missing` when both `true` and `false` are correct answers for different...