Steven

[Originally posted by @wayne on Codeplex, Thread #566865 | Message #1327083 | 2014-11-28] Ok, thanks for the information. Seems to make sense. I have a couple of questions: 1) It...

[Originally posted by @dotnetjunkie on Codeplex, Thread #566865 | Message #1327201 | 2014-11-29] Wayne, What we actually did was not to implement "row based security for 'read' access" but actually...

[Originally posted by @jjwilliams on Codeplex, Thread #566865 | Message #1360439 | 2015-03-06] This is an awesome thread - I've been following it for awhile now. I have used the...

[Originally posted by @dotnetjunkie on Codeplex, Thread #566865 | Message #1360445 | 2015-03-06] Hi jjwilliams, That's because Simple Injector differentiates the registration of collections from one-to-one mappings. So you need...

[Originally posted by @??? on Codeplex, Thread #566865 | Message #1436228 | 2015-07-27] We have decided to go back and apply some of these Permissions across our application as our...

[Originally posted by @dotnetjunkie on Codeplex, Thread #566865 | Message #1436262 | 2015-07-28] > But how does the Permission attribute hit the DB to check the actual permissions at the...

I'm afraid I don't fully understand what problem you are trying to solve. Could you elaborate a bit? Do you need some kind of queuing? Or perhaps some kind of...

I wouldn't say the command depends on the query; it simply depends on the location id. How to proceed here, depends a bit on the technology, but say that you're...

Why are you injecting two instances of the same abstraction (IArea) into a single constructor (Component). That seems like a Liskov Substitution Principle violation to me. What happens if you...

The design philosophy of Simple Injector is to have a design that pushes developers into the right design, by making it easy to do the right thing and harder (but...