runtime icon indicating copy to clipboard operation
runtime copied to clipboard

[mono] [aot] Mono mini and LLVM fullAOT CI jobs are failing due to Failed to load AOT module X86_Sse2_r/ro.dll in aot-only mode

Open matouskozak opened this issue 1 year ago • 5 comments

Build Information

Build: https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=670895 Build error leg or test failing: HardwareIntrinsics_X86_r, HardwareIntrinsics_X86_ro

Error Message

Fill the error message using step by step known issues guidance.

{
  "ErrorPattern": "Failed to load AOT module '.*JIT\\/HardwareIntrinsics\\/HardwareIntrinsics_X86_(ro|r)\\/X86_Sse2_(ro|r).dll.so' \\('.*\\/JIT\\/HardwareIntrinsics\\/HardwareIntrinsics_X86_(ro|r)\\/X86_Sse2_(ro|r).dll'\\) in aot-only mode.",
  "BuildRetry": false,
  "ExcludeConsoleLog": false
}

Known issue validation

Build: :mag_right: https://dev.azure.com/dnceng-public/public/_build/results?buildId=670895 Error message validated: [Failed to load AOT module '.*JIT\/HardwareIntrinsics\/HardwareIntrinsics_X86_(ro|r)\/X86_Sse2_(ro|r).dll.so' \('.*\/JIT\/HardwareIntrinsics\/HardwareIntrinsics_X86_(ro|r)\/X86_Sse2_(ro|r).dll'\) in aot-only mode.] Result validation: :white_check_mark: Known issue matched with the provided build. Validation performed at: 5/13/2024 11:35:32 AM UTC

Report

Summary

24-Hour Hit Count 7-Day Hit Count 1-Month Count
0 0 0

matouskozak avatar May 13 '24 11:05 matouskozak

The rolling-build failures are observable from https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/commit/315c4c414e9f3bb61c8c0e0bb31ece4daa631430. Range to the previous green rolling-build is https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/compare/9926d609dab5929941b7924a04521ea2c2df27f3...315c4c414e9f3bb61c8c0e0bb31ece4daa631430. Could it be caused by https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/101681 @mkhamoyan ?

matouskozak avatar May 13 '24 11:05 matouskozak

@matouskozak looks like it is related to https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/102037, and mentioned in https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/pull/101886

mkhamoyan avatar May 13 '24 12:05 mkhamoyan

@matouskozak looks like it is related to #102037, and mentioned in #101886

You are right, thank you.

matouskozak avatar May 13 '24 13:05 matouskozak

FYI: @steveisok @fanyang-mono

matouskozak avatar May 13 '24 14:05 matouskozak

Since this is x86, I'd say the priority is low and we should disable the test.

steveisok avatar May 13 '24 15:05 steveisok