Peter Dons Tychsen

@sonatique We need to quantify the problem I a way we can both see it. Could you re-run your tests with this app? It is a modification of your original...

> Hi, thanks. My point is that the only ever version of libusb-win32 (libusb0.sys) I experienced BSOD with is your last experimental one. I used libusb-win32 for years (official release...

>>Quick question though: when you say "high number of completed transactions" : I have trouble understanding how this >>relates to lisbusb-1.0 transfers . What i mean is to fix the...

> The benefit of increasing the buffer size is thus lost when using more than one buffer (basically all results are equal to test with N buffer of 64K, whatever...

Well we probably need to update the wiki anyway, or remove it. I am kind of old-school so I was thinking of having the documentation inside the repo, so that...

New snapshots: https://sourceforge.net/projects/libusb-win32/files/libusb-win32-snapshots/20230920/

> @dontech : side question: any plan to compile libusb0.sys for ARM64, by luck? Yes. I can probably get it to compile, but I don't currently have a windows device...

Tormod, again you are spot on. Super annoying :-) :+1: However, unless the driver verifyer starts complaining, I am going to try to push these changes until we deprecate Windows...

Additionally it is worth noticing that this is not a win8 feature, but actually is supported all the way back to Vista. It was introduced in the win8 SDK, but...