chore(lint): turn on `curly` again

[vladfrangu]

Please describe the changes this PR makes and why it should be merged:

Each commit does a specific change only, so you can review just one of them. This just turns on curly again

Status and versioning classification:

• This PR only includes non-code changes, like changes to documentation, README, etc.

[vercel[bot]]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
discord-js-guide	Ready	Preview	Comment	Oct 5, 2025 1:17pm

1 Skipped Deployment

Project	Deployment	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
discord-js	Ignored	Preview		Oct 5, 2025 1:17pm

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

:x: Patch coverage is 63.63636% with 232 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review. :white_check_mark: Project coverage is 44.77%. Comparing base (612c49b) to head (8dc1692). :warning: Report is 94 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
packages/voice/src/networking/Networking.ts	0.00%	55 Missing :warning:
packages/voice/src/networking/DAVESession.ts	0.00%	37 Missing :warning:
packages/structures/src/bitfields/BitField.ts	18.51%	22 Missing :warning:
...actions/src/releasePackages/generateReleaseTree.ts	0.00%	18 Missing :warning:
packages/core/src/client.ts	0.00%	18 Missing :warning:
packages/voice/src/VoiceConnection.ts	63.63%	16 Missing :warning:
packages/voice/src/audio/AudioPlayer.ts	50.00%	9 Missing :warning:
packages/rest/src/lib/handlers/Shared.ts	0.00%	8 Missing :warning:
packages/rest/src/lib/utils/utils.ts	70.83%	7 Missing :warning:
packages/voice/src/receive/VoiceReceiver.ts	70.83%	7 Missing :warning:
... and 9 more

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main   #10931      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   44.32%   44.77%   +0.44%     
==========================================
  Files         313      313              
  Lines       18026    18455     +429     
  Branches     1791     1879      +88     
==========================================
+ Hits         7990     8263     +273     
- Misses      10024    10184     +160     
+ Partials       12        8       -4     

Flag	Coverage Δ
brokers	25.88% <0.00%> (-0.42%)	:arrow_down:
builders	80.21% <100.00%> (+0.01%)	:arrow_up:
collection	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
core	0.92% <0.00%> (-0.01%)	:arrow_down:
formatters	99.69% <100.00%> (+0.03%)	:arrow_up:
proxy	65.88% <ø> (ø)
rest	86.92% <56.09%> (-0.64%)	:arrow_down:
structures	83.87% <15.62%> (-1.32%)	:arrow_down:
util	43.28% <ø> (ø)
utilities	5.90% <0.00%> (-0.40%)	:arrow_down:
voice	59.05% <38.49%> (-1.34%)	:arrow_down:
ws	35.83% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

:rocket: New features to boost your workflow:

• :snowflake: Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• :package: JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[ckohen]

I think I fundamentally disagree with this rule for many of the cases it changes here, especially when combined with padding-line-between-statements enabled for after multline blocks.

A couple of the changes made I do like (I never noticed them and it indeed makes it more readable). The majority change 2+ lines of consecutive short-circuiting into exponentially more lines which makes it really hard to tell what is going on (every line becomes 4 with no easily readable and clear separation between checks and functional code)