dirkf
dirkf
It's not the portability, just that a _sed_ script is pretty opaque to anyone other than its author. Given a list of real-world cases that need to be fixed, we...
For this to be considered, let alone accepted, someone will have to update #29932, including a valid test URL; the URL there, which was inadequate anyway as a .jpg, and...
Pls review #30839 **as asked** to learn how to install a valid up-to-date version of the program. But almost surely, updating won't fix this problem which [has also been reported...
You follow the developer instructions in the manual; or someone else does. Basically, fork this repository, check out the latest master and make a new git branch; then put the...
So I did that, and now it's in PR #31892, waiting for some Oz-based testing.
There are some suggestions in the PR.
I don't think it was in doubt that the extractor from the _yt-dlp_ PR worked. Are you saying that the extractor module from #31892 also works with _yt-dlp_? If so...
What you described was patching _yt-dlp_ (using Python 3.9), not the yt-dl installation shown in the original verbose log: >...`/Library/.../python3.9/site-packages/`*yt_dlp*`/extractor/tenplay.py` vs (_youtube-dl_ using Python 3.5): >... `/..../youtube-dl/youtube_dl/extractor/common.py` >... >... `/Users/..../miniconda3/lib/python3.5/...`...
Unfortunately that doesn't help at all since it's testing _yt-dlp_. You seem to have switched programs from that shown in OP and so gone out of scope here.
The corresponding PR for _yt-dlp_ has been merged. You can use it by installing the nightly build, I expect (`--update-to-nightly`?). The _yt-dlp_ tracker is the place to look for your...